|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Foghorn
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Posts: 49 Location: Barcombe, E Sussex
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28237 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
sally_in_wales Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 06 Mar 2005 Posts: 20809 Location: sunny wales
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28237 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 10744
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28237 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Lisa
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 248 Location: Cheshire
|
|
|
|
|
Lozzie
Joined: 25 May 2005 Posts: 2595
|
|
|
|
|
alison Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 12918 Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 06 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
Lozzie wrote: |
I can never understand how it is that things, having been scientifically proven not to work, somehow continue to work. |
The thing about dowsing is that your success rate is pretty high if you just pick lower ground and places where slopes change. Such changes in topography usually reflect a change underground. And its amazing watching a dowser, they'll pick out such places time and time again, and if one of them turns out to be a water source they'll claim success (despite the three earlier drillings that came back cry). Give me a good A-level geography student and I'll teach them to spot such changes in topology within an hour, and get a similar success rate to that of a doswer.
The common way of testing, usually accepted by dowsers as an easy one to pass, is to get six upturned bins and put a cup of water under one of them. Time and time again dowsers enthusiastically try to demonstrate that their system works better than pure chance, and time and time again they fail. Invariably, after doing it, they start finding reasons why it didn't work.
Thing that I find hardest here is that dowsers always seem to be really sincere, interesting people. Really good eggs, at least in my experience. So its such a shame that what they do doesn't really work any better than chance and topology
It isn't, of course, absolutely proven that it doesn't work (such absolutes are not what science is about, anyone who asks science for such absolutes needs a glass of perspective and tonic, and perhaps a lie down). It has merely been proven to the point where one can't make a ralistic case in favour of dowsing.
So for me, its filed away as one of those things I'd really love to believe, but don't. |
|
|
|
|
gil Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 18415
|
|
|
|
|
Foghorn
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Posts: 49 Location: Barcombe, E Sussex
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 06 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
Thanks for the replies folks - if anyone has anything on wells, I'd greatly appreciate a steer.
On the dowsing side, I tried it for the first time at the weekend, and it was fascinating. I had an experienced dowser as a guide, and was initially sceptical. I tried dowsing for water, and for energy from megalithic stones (Avebury) as well as energy lines. The rods turned for me at exactly the right point, almost every time I did it, sometimes when I knew where the point of interference was, sometimes when I had no idea. I've since tried it in the garden, and I seem to be picking out moving water quite effectively.
I'm fairly confident that I wasn't deceiving myself, knowingly or otherwise. The experienced dowser did tell me that you have to know what you want to find, and be able to visualise it. If you just run around with dowsing rods, you'll get some hits, but you won't know why.
From what I can see, I don't think dowsing has been properly evaluated, because I think there is a fundmanetal lack of understanding about how it works - I don't think dowsers even know how it works. So blind trials, etc. are not necessarily going to be conclusive, because I think dowsing relies on some level of awareness of the wider environment.
And it seems to be water courses (moving water) as opposed to static water that makes the greatest impact, and this is certainly what I found.
It's easy to dismiss dowsing, particularly as it seems to be associated with a lot of fairly ethereal new age stuff, but it's been around for a long time, and there is something inherently logical about a sensitive device (human + indicating rods) being able to respond to changes in the electromagnetic spectrum, even quite small ones. I know that's not the full story, but keeping an open mind isn't such a great hardship, particularly when "hard science" so routinely fails to deliver. |
|
|
|
|
gil Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 18415
|
|
|
|
|
gingerwelly
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 Posts: 419 Location: Wales ...in cardiff at the mo but from mid wales
|
|
|
|
|
Foghorn
Joined: 23 Nov 2004 Posts: 49 Location: Barcombe, E Sussex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|