|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Bazil
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 181 Location: Near Shrewsbury, Shropshire
|
|
|
|
|
hoarebag
Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 5
|
|
|
|
|
Bazil
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 181 Location: Near Shrewsbury, Shropshire
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 05 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
Ummm.
1st off. Its DC. So beware any tables relating to AC mains.
2nd. The heating in a resistance (like a cable) is proportional to the *square* of the current. It goes up fast.
3rd. I know that for mains use, cables must be de-rated (given a lower limit) if they are enclosed so that they cannot shed heat so well. You have to rate the cable based on its hottest point, which might just be where it goes through a joist, or is buried in roof insulation, goes through a warm area or is bunched with other cables... My guess is that armoured cable might have a *lower* current rating than the same conductor size in simple pvc. And that it should be further derated if it is going to be buried in the soil.
4th. The lower the voltage, the more significant the voltage drop, and the power loss. That power loss can be reduced by using lower resistance, bigger cross-section, cable - quite apart from whether the smaller cable could carry that current without danger.
I found this size calculation webpage
https://www.unlimited-power.co.uk/cable_sizing.html
the site being that of the "Energy Development Co-operative" who are all about renewables. There's an invitation to contact them for more advice...
I reckon you might need two or three times your 1.5mm^2 cross section of conductor. Which, if you have stock of that stuff, you might run in duplicate or triplicate... |
|
|
|
|
nathanbriggs
Joined: 23 Mar 2005 Posts: 35 Location: Chester
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|