The Nuclear debate

Latest Articles

The Nuclear debate

Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment

Author

Message

Marts

Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 352
Location: London

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 05 10:44 am Post subject: The Nuclear debate
Thought some of you might find this interesting. It's an exchange of e-mails between Sir David Wallace, Vice President of the Royal Society and nuclear supporter with Tom Burke, a visiting Professor at Imperial College London and a nuclear sceptic. https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4248746.stm

Blue Peter

Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 2400
Location: Milton Keynes

Posted: Wed Oct 19, 05 1:08 pm Post subject:

From my perspective, the problem with both nuclear and coal is that neither is particularly renewable, e.g. see:

https://www.fraw.org.uk/ebo/intro.html

which suggests that if we ran all the UK electricity from coal, then our stocks would only last another 9 years. Similarly, if the world had solely uranium based electricity, then uranium stocks would only last 15 - 20 years (and I've seen shorter figures elsewhere).

Both positions of the speakers seem to be based on continued growth (which might make those 2 numbers above smaller), but what happens when we run out of both coal and uranium?

Rather, we should be using our current surplusses in energy sources to move (downsize) to a more sustainable economy.

Peter.

dpack

Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46247
Location: yes

Posted: Thu Oct 20, 05 10:03 pm Post subject:
im unsure but i have been collecting data. i wont make my mind up yet , as dont know enough . i should sort a web space to share my info though .coppice or technicium well ??/////garden or jet set beans ??/////i'll shut up now .

	Downsizer Forum Index -> Conservation and Environment	All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

View Latest Posts