|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Stacey
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 8380 Location: Kernow
|
|
|
|
|
2steps
Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Posts: 5349 Location: Surrey
|
|
|
|
|
bagpuss
Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 10507 Location: cambridge
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 8380 Location: Kernow
|
|
|
|
|
Helen_A
Joined: 26 Jan 2005 Posts: 1548 Location: MK, Bucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 8380 Location: Kernow
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 8380 Location: Kernow
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Stacey
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 8380 Location: Kernow
|
|
|
|
|
Fee
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 15922 Location: Earth
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 07 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
Don't you have to pay for it? I did look at it, but I don't post all that many parcels, and it didn't seem worth it. I think it was 4.99 a month, if I posted more than the odd parcel it would be worth it in the time I saved in the post office.
Personally, I would use it, anyway. I use a main town post office, as I work there, and post offices are only open in working hours, so I don't much choice. The queues are so terrible that I have been know to go with a colleauge, and share the queuing - she queues for the first half of our lunch hour, and I for the second! |
|
|
|
|
Stacey
Joined: 18 Jul 2005 Posts: 8380 Location: Kernow
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 07 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
wellington womble wrote: |
Don't you have to pay for it? I did look at it, but I don't post all that many parcels, and it didn't seem worth it. I think it was 4.99 a month, if I posted more than the odd parcel it would be worth it in the time I saved in the post office.
Personally, I would use it, anyway. I use a main town post office, as I work there, and post offices are only open in working hours, so I don't much choice. The queues are so terrible that I have been know to go with a colleauge, and share the queuing - she queues for the first half of our lunch hour, and I for the second! |
No - you can do the small/medium buisness Smartstamp thing for �4.99 a month but the only extra cost to print your own is that you have to provide a label or something to actually print it onto. If it's a letter you can just print straight onto the envelope.
https://www.royalmail.com/portal/rm/jump3?mediaId=26800663&catId=400043&campaignid=olphomepagepromo |
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 07 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
Stacey wrote: |
dougal wrote: |
Stacey wrote: |
I print a certificate of posting |
Really? How can that be valid for compensation? |
No idea dougal. You could try looking at the royal mail site. Do you have a point of view as to whether it's an ethically acceptable alternative to actually queuing up in a post office or are you just looking for a fight? |
I have asked how it is different to buying the stamps and sticking them on yourself.
I have asked how you can print a "Certificate of Postage" for yourself - which as I'm sure folk will know is a receipt certifying that the Post Office have received the item - and worth �32 if the item gets lost.
I haven't had an answer.
Instead I'm asked if I'm "looking for a fight"!
I don't see how this can be an alternative to "queuing up at the post office" for anything that requires a receipt for the item, or for anything that won't fit into a pillar box.
I recognise that there is a cashflow advantage in not having to buy stamps in advance, and potentially from paying on credit card, but, er, that's about it as an advantage for the poster of things that don't go straight into letter boxes.
As I've said, printing your own good-looking labels isn't difficult.
And there's no need for the chap at the counter to stick anything on - if you don't wish him to. You can stick ordinary stamps on yourself!
The loss of revenue to local sub-post offices from this particular innovation would seem to be less than the losses that they have already experienced from changes to benefit payments, post office bank accounts, passport applications and vehicle re-licensing (and there are probably others).
In the current situation, it would be hard to be cheerful about running most rural sub-postoffices these days.
If you don't mind taking your parcels further to hand them in at another post office, then don't support your local one with your trade - and for things other than stamps, too.
Without trade (not just yours), it'll probably close quite soon, and you'll *have* to travel further with your parcels.
Its as simple as that.
Practicality, not ethics. |
|
|
|
|
Penny Outskirts
Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 23385 Location: Planet, not on the....
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 07 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
If we had a local post office, we'd use it without question, but we don't, so we use smartstamp - we do post out quite a few parcels a day, so it's worth it to us.
If it's a choice between Smartstamp, and going into town, finding parking, paying for parking, fighting through the people, queueing at the post office, I'll take the Smartstamp I'm afraid. |
|
|
|
|
|