|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
hedgewitch
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 5834 Location: Daft wench GHQ
|
|
|
|
|
Silas
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6848 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
|
|
|
hedgewitch
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 5834 Location: Daft wench GHQ
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
quixote
Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 198
|
|
|
|
|
hedgewitch
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 5834 Location: Daft wench GHQ
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 06 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
bodger wrote: |
I totaly agree with peoples rights to resort to civil disobedience .
Criminal damage is an arrestable offence however and as such the land owner is permitted to use reasonable force to arrest the offender.
In reality however, how many landowners would be mentaly or physicaly prepared to meet with such a confrontation |
This is where the morality of civil disobedience gets all complicated.
I think we'll all probably look back on some of the great civil disobedience protests with admiration; whether its the suffragettes, the poll tax, whatever. Its a way of affecting political change at great personal cost.
But when the target of such civil disobedience is an individual rather than the state, someone who is as vulnerable if not more so than the person doing the civil disobedience, then there isn't really any possibility of affecting political change.
So it seems natural that people on both sides would get rather heated, if you're setting a trap like this legally then you don't see anyone interfering with it as an agent of political change, you see them as a criminal. And of course if you feel strongly enough about trapping in this way such that you'll take the law into your own hands then you see such criminality as worthwhile.
I would say that unless you're at one pole or the other you'll see grey areas here, so the most important questions to ask are about whether such traps are cruel, how cruel they are in that instance, how well they work, why they're seen as necessary and whether or not there are better alternatives. Without answering such questions its impossible to come to any moral conclusions, and neither the hunter nor the protestor are vindicated. |
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004 Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
Silas
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6848 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
|
|
|
Northern_Lad
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 14210 Location: Somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
quixote
Joined: 26 Oct 2006 Posts: 198
|
|
|
|
|
hedgewitch
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 5834 Location: Daft wench GHQ
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Northern_Lad
Joined: 13 Dec 2004 Posts: 14210 Location: Somewhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|