|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
VSS
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 2845 Location: Llyn Peninsula, North Wales
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
|
|
|
|
Green Man
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 5272 Location: Rural Scotland.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 07 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
Cho-ku-ri wrote: |
Farmers, thanks to the subsidies the French and Germans fought for, are so much more resilient than textile or manufacturing businessmen that have long since relocated.
Are we really all prepared to watch it revert to non-productive scrub? |
This is a common misconception that subsidies have helped British farmers. Yes, short term, they improved the viability of some farming enterprises but they, along with the regulations & stipulations that go with them, have held the industry back, resistant to change. Some sectors didn't have the subs,such as pigs & poultry, which meant that to compete with the subsidised sectors they had to go more intensive to be viable. If we hadn't had the subs, I can't see there would have been as much intensive farming as has developed. |
|
|
|
|
Lorrainelovesplants
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 6521 Location: Dordogne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|