|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Brownbear
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14929 Location: South West
|
|
|
|
|
Silas
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6848 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
|
|
|
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
|
|
|
|
|
SheepShed
Joined: 08 Nov 2006 Posts: 332 Location: In the middle of a Welsh forest
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
|
|
|
|
Silas
Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Posts: 6848 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
|
|
|
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
|
|
|
|
|
Brownbear
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14929 Location: South West
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 08 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
crofter wrote: |
Brownbear wrote: |
It's probably my fault for failing to respect diversity ('the Hare Coursing Community') again. |
If I remember correctly, you stated earlier in the thread that you do not have a problem with people hunting with dogs for food, they just become sadists when dogs are used to hunt for sport. Do you consider the breeding of large numbers of ducks and pheasants specifically for the purpose of being shot (and people who shoot for sport rather than food) as sadistic also? |
A good and interesting question. Firstly, as far as duck are concerned, I had no idea any one bred them for release as a quarry species. If that is the case, then what I say about pheasant applies to released duck also.
For pheasant shooting, I don't think the majority of people take part for the pleasure of killing (it would be a lot cheaper and easier just to buy a dozen guinea pigs, take them home and hit them all with hammers, or set the dog on them), though I have heard of cases (on shoots where wealthy idiots demand high bags on shoots in order to impress their guests, or to satisfy some obscure willy-waggling desire to 'bag' more than other shoots) where an excess of birds have been shot and their remains buried in a pit. I've never seen it or seen actual 'evidence' of it, but I have heard it reported anecdotally and do not consider it impossible.
In this case - where the birds are shot and then wasted, it is certainly pointless, and therefore immoral. The method of killing - shotgun fire - is a more humane one than being torn asunder by hounds, so I would not go so far as to call it sadistic. I would however say, wherever it has happened or might in the future happen, that it is absolutely disgraceful behaviour, and all involved should hang their heads in shame (or as they would have no shame, in abject apology for the foul name they give all responsible Guns), and should sell their guns and take up airsofting. |
|
|
|
|
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
|
|
|
|
|
Brownbear
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 14929 Location: South West
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 08 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
Personally, I enjoy shooting. I do not enjoy shooting because it involves killing things, but I do enjoy eating whatever I might shoot. This morning for an hour or so before dawn I was lying in a swamp waiting for a chance to shoot a goose, but they decided to visit somebody else's fields today. I would have preferred to have one hanging up as I type this, but it was a good way to start the day regardless. Thanks to Brownbear for a considered reply, I thought there might be an inconsistency in your argument, but I see there is not!
Brownbear wrote: |
On th topic of releasing birds into the wild with the intention of later shooting them for food, I would point out that it is a sweeter life and less stressful death than farmed meat animals get, however well they may be cared for. |
I am not going to argue with this point, although I do not entirely agree... (battery cages?!) |
|
|
|
|
gil Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Posts: 18415
|
|
|
|
|
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
|