|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45676 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45676 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Solar
Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45676 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Solar
Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 05 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
One risks comparing Apples and Oranges.
Solar Thermal (heat collecting) and PV (electricity generation) are different animals.
So different that they should rarely be considered together - and *never* as alternatives, one to the other.
(OK there are such things as heat driven irrigation pumps - but that technology is more applicable to Africa than Essex.)
Solar PV can provide a simply-deployed source of (fairly small quantities of) electrical power. And electricity is the most versatile form of applicable energy. But it comes at a premium cost. Energy from solar pv would be a frightfully expensive means of heating.
Equally, generating electricity from solar thermal is so perverse that it has no real application either.
To *compare* "efficiency" in terms of energy per unit area of the collector is irrelevant in the real world.
The economic efficiency, how many watts per � cost, is something any buyer should be interested in.
More obscure, but worthy of consideration, is the resource efficiency - what resource investment goes into the manufacture of each watt of output capacity. Its a tough job to get those figures.
So, in short, you're worrying about the wrong thing in terms of panel area, Tahir.
Think of what *cost* the panels might be, but don't bother about whether or not there's enough room in the field! |
|
|
|
|
Mr Solar
Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 05 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
I expect if I carried out a survey across all those who subscribe to this web site with the question 'How many of you have invested in any form of renewable energy' I expect the the reply will be around 0.1%, hence the main reason this government will in the end go for Nuclear, more wind farms and more imported gas as the answer to this countries needs. To date over �6 billion has been invested by interested parties to secure supplies of gas for the UK market as far as Malaysia, but at what cost to get it here?
Six year ago a person asked me what the price of a solar hot water system was, I replied around �3,000 installed.
At that time gas was so cheap you could hardly meter it, so the so called pay back based on gas units consumed was around 25-50 years.
Reply back from this person, the price of solar hot water has to come down !, to what level I replied, answer, under �1,000 pounds installed to reduce hot water costs by 70%, with the goverment paying half.
Excluding the 2-3 qualified heating engineers we use, who today charge around 200.00 a day each, does not leave much for the 16 odd componants assoiated with the system, so I said come back in 5 years.
That person called me back 6 months ago, requesting the same information.
I replied, in that 5 years I have reduced my gas bill by �570.00 pounds, How much has the gas utility given you back for using their fuel? Prices of our solar hot water system did reduce in cost a year ago to �2,500 installed with improved technology, however sadly the price of energy has risen, as has materials, as has shipping, as has labour etc etc , so the price is now �3,200 pounds, unless you DIY and save the �800.00 of labour?
My final reply was, while 99% of the population continue to purchase energy/power as an onging loan through out your life, the utilities will keep raising its prices to what ever the world market dictates and nothing anyone can do about it, except enhance the heat and power of the sun, where the energy is both tax free and has a fixed zero cost for life.
To that person I spoke to 6 years ago, I told him its better that the people of this country continue as they have for the past 100 years burning what we have left, then when we have an energy/power crises, as was the case in 1973 then act.
The good news is for our company, sales to the USA have trippled as they have already reconsied a wake up call as gas prices rose 70% this year and rising.
Next year when the low carbon buildings directive hits every developer and house builder, very few companies like ours will be servicing the home owner, instead looking to service the house builder who with a government and EU stick, at their cost have to reduce carbon emmisions by a further 18%, was 25%, watered down under pressure from home builders, to your cost.
Once the new build market starts to use solar thermal as a way to reduce 1/2 ton of Co2 per year per house and gain the A rating certificate, this the industry hopes will start to effect the existing home market when in 2007, every home owner has to have a survey on the house before it can be offered for sale.
Some interesting times ahead for all of us whos head is stuck firmly in the sand.
The bright side to those buying these new homes, is the gas/oil boiler has now gone, as has steel radiators and servicing. |
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|