|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
Shan
Joined: 13 Jan 2009 Posts: 9075 Location: South Wales
|
|
|
|
|
Shane
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 3467 Location: Doha. Is hot.
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 19 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
this is getting difficult, i like the look of the d80 and standard multilength lens pack for probably less than i would expect that level of performance and it has quick set " scene " modes which can be handy. less than a grand for the basics and a few hundred for decent cards, hoods , extra batteries etc bags . a k and a little bit.
even for hd video or a decent photo edit tool i will need a new pooter and decent monitor for cutting and rendering so another 1.5 k if i build it
so if i can live without " scene" modes i could spend an extra k and a bit for a d5 mk iv and an even better multi use lens and then see what other lenses i can or need to aquire
i just realised it was 1964 when i took and developed my first film so no mountain or face settings are really needed even if they are quick shortcuts at times, if in dought 55mm, f8 and get close enough to fill the frame chance are there will be enough image to make a snap.
my chum had a d2 that i somewhat coveted a while back when i upgraded to my first digi compact but he had a newsroom work station and a picture editor
to be realistic i need to decide between maybe 3k and a pretty good camera etc or 5k and a really nice one with some decent hardware/ software for snaps and video included.
i have a legit but no longer supported full cs3 which if i can migrate it to a new pooter might be ok for stills but 4k video is a bit data rich for old stuff. hum ho hum.
if i work out some possible ways to monetise the images i will go for the good stuff and take it from there. no weddins no christenins no children and gurning parents no pets and definitely no weddins.
i did one wedding for a chum, 2 cameras for every our day snap and wandering pap for the other guests and fun aspects, i did a decent job but it was well stressful
i would be up for autopsies , war zones or most other things that are far more relaxing than ..... oh i just remembered there are folk who do snot child snaps in shopping centres and print them off for a tenner for the proud parent , uuughhh.
that job offer was considered unsuitable by the person your interlocutor refers to with the perpendicular pronoun
if i want a pocket camera my phone or compact ones are fine but i quite fancy using 55 yrs practice with some top end kit while i have the chance
i would be better for the rigours of even domestic wildlife imaging to have pro kit and it does give a better chance of producing decent work
i need to consider this |
|
|
|
|
Shane
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 3467 Location: Doha. Is hot.
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Shane
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 3467 Location: Doha. Is hot.
|
|
|
|
|
sgt.colon
Joined: 27 Jul 2009 Posts: 7380 Location: Just south of north.
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45674 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 19 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
thanks folks, it would seem the studio side of stuff is possible if i am sensible and get the right kit.
plugging into the hoover dam to run the pooter seems rather last decade
the super fast drive does seem a good idea and quite a few chassis styles can handle a decent cpu, gpu, sound and lots of ram
if i go lappy i do get one screen for tools or for gp use
sd mentioned that between ps online, a decent work book, a phone and the camera the my side pooter power could be reduced to a minimum.
i do like the idea of simple but i also like the idea of no dependency on online stuff
as i am on grid , planning a very local project , i could spit a cherry stone at it and win so i should be able to keep it simple
and recon the kit is plausible so now i need to get a spec together
body
100mm macro with dedicated ring light
20 to 200 gp lens
pooter
software/facilities
decent biggish 4k monitor
gulp even if i have or can borrow, beg, make, etc a few odds n ends to complete the kit
back in the olden days to do what i would like to do was maybe possible but it would have been daft expensive, very low res in many senses and a nightmare
observe
gather data
record good images
enjoy doing it, consider how this funds the next one or is a useful/fun thing to do as appropriate
decent motives i spose but if i find a new species in my very small urban jungle it will get a very appropriate and silly name.
most of the wildlife is pretty chilled about me so no hides or lens like la palma nonsense, it gets get very up close and personal and most of it does not bite me very much.
art and science sort of meet when i look at the hedge, tis pretty but it is also fascinating as an urban microhabitat
it might be fun to play with this |
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|