|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46235 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15985
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 16 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
They claim to have planted a million now I think. Trouble is, planting isn't the same as raising them.
Windblow is less of a problem if you don't cut any Tre. I think there is some thinning needed in the early years, but then they are cut in blocks. I am not into conifers myself, as we have very few, and do natural regeneration in our wood, so it tends to be self perpetuating hardwoods.
Interesting about New England and the Amazon. I know that there are old farms hidden in the New England forests, but didn't know there is a theory they were mainly conifers. Can't see why the conifers would have been cut in preference really, because the settlers were probably from Britain, so would have expected to build their houses of hardwoods, and used them for tools and carts. |
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
|