Guys, you need to chill out a bit. Its looking to me like mods tempers are fraying, and it looks like members tempers are fraying too. And in those circumstances neither modding decisions nor decisions on what to post will be as well considered as they should be. This resurrected thread is surely very good evidence that you don't get good moderation in this place by poking the mods with a stick.
Edit: And, mods, while your position in recent events is of course no-win, comments like the above one aren't helping either. Chill.
Last edited by cab on Mon Mar 07, 11 11:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
- so its hats off to the mods (well, some of them anyway) for bothering to do the job in the first place.
I agree with this. I am sorry if the moderators think that I am pestering them unnecessarily and am aware that it is their ball. However, I am disturbed that someone could be banned simply for being in a relationship with somebody else who was banned. I am merely seeking confirmation as to whether this is in fact the case, and if so, is it now policy for future bans?
I agree with this. I am sorry if the moderators think that I am pestering them unnecessarily and am aware that it is their ball. However, I am disturbed that someone could be banned simply for being in a relationship with somebody else who was banned. I am merely seeking confirmation as to whether this is in fact the case, and if so, is it now policy for future bans?
They won't (and can't) tell you why they've done something like that. Its confidential, its between them and whichever member, and they shouldn't be drawn into a guessing game on the subject either (was it because..?).
I don't know if Madame Bear has been banned. If she has been, then I don't know why. But I'd respect our modding team less for breaching confidentiality; that really is an absolute no-no.
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
View Latest Posts