|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
earthyvirgo
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 7972 Location: creating prints in the loft, Gerlan
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
|
|
|
|
joanne
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 7100 Location: Morecambe, Lancashire
|
|
|
|
|
sueshells
Joined: 20 Jan 2009 Posts: 690 Location: North Bucks
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46249 Location: yes
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 14 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
what they say about prices for premises seems sensible
for storage nearish and secure are top priority
for a workspace to expand production near is vital
a combination of both nearby and very good value for money would be ideal
if you are thinking of employing staff a basic equation is their cost in wages etc should be no more than 50% of the extra work you get done ,ie charge them out at about(at least) twice what it costs you to hire them.
this covers overheads.downtime ,hols ,replacing them,treats to retain them ,insuring them etc etc as well giving extra turnover and some extra profits(try for 25% extra profit on a worse case scenario).
the numbers might need adjusting for"wats" or fancy stuff but the basic principal applies .
beware maternity leave ,potential employment law issues,hns,family or illness issues ,rogues etc etc
beware cash flow issues ,you can perhaps wait for wages but an employee must be paid as agreed by contract (yes law again , a written contract that will stand up in court if needs be is not a waste of up front money)
this might seem a ruthless way to consider taking on staff but it is daft to gain a lot of responsibilities and some potential risks for no (fairly) certain business gain.
i found directly employing one or two good uns fairly long term with a bit of churn not impossibly difficult to manage to everybody's benefit.if they are good they can become almost family in a small enterprise.
it can take a few rejects to get the right ones ,if you need quite a few at short notice sub contracting is a good option rather than a lot of hire /train/ reject hire again etc .
if a job is repetitive sub contracting it out can be a good option
i know much of what you do is very specialized and skilled but some of it is basic hands on skills ,would it make sense to separate these and subcontract jobs such as rat stitching ,tail inversion etc and concentrate on design,market development ,specialist historical stuff and the other things that you are good at ?
that was a free sample of my consultancy skills |
|
|
|
|
earthyvirgo
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 7972 Location: creating prints in the loft, Gerlan
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 14 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
dpack wrote: |
what they say about prices for premises seems sensible
for storage nearish and secure are top priority
for a workspace to expand production near is vital
a combination of both nearby and very good value for money would be ideal
if you are thinking of employing staff a basic equation is their cost in wages etc should be no more than 50% of the extra work you get done ,ie charge them out at about(at least) twice what it costs you to hire them.
this covers overheads.downtime ,hols ,replacing them,treats to retain them ,insuring them etc etc as well giving extra turnover and some extra profits(try for 25% extra profit on a worse case scenario).
the numbers might need adjusting for"wats" or fancy stuff but the basic principal applies .
beware maternity leave ,potential employment law issues,hns,family or illness issues ,rogues etc etc
beware cash flow issues ,you can perhaps wait for wages but an employee must be paid as agreed by contract (yes law again , a written contract that will stand up in court if needs be is not a waste of up front money)
this might seem a ruthless way to consider taking on staff but it is daft to gain a lot of responsibilities and some potential risks for no (fairly) certain business gain.
i found directly employing one or two good uns fairly long term with a bit of churn not impossibly difficult to manage to everybody's benefit.if they are good they can become almost family in a small enterprise.
it can take a few rejects to get the right ones ,if you need quite a few at short notice sub contracting is a good option rather than a lot of hire /train/ reject hire again etc .
if a job is repetitive sub contracting it out can be a good option
i know much of what you do is very specialized and skilled but some of it is basic hands on skills ,would it make sense to separate these and subcontract jobs such as rat stitching ,tail inversion etc and concentrate on design,market development ,specialist historical stuff and the other things that you are good at ?
that was a free sample of my consultancy skills |
Very wise advice re becoming an employer.
Law has made it overly cumbersome for a small business, so it's best kept as simple as possible by using as many .gov documents and basic templates as you can to save writing your own, when it comes to contracts.
Know and keep to the statutory requirements re pay/hols/maternity etc.
EV |
|
|
|
|
kGarden
Joined: 01 Dec 2014 Posts: 178 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
|
|
|
|
boisdevie1
Joined: 11 Aug 2006 Posts: 3897 Location: Lancaster
|
|
|
|
|
MornieG
Joined: 17 Jan 2013 Posts: 933 Location: Bromham, Wiltshire
|
|
|
|
|
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
|
|
|
|
|
Lorrainelovesplants
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 6521 Location: Dordogne
|
|
|
|
|
vegplot
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 21301 Location: Bethesda, Gwynedd
|
|
|
|
|
kGarden
Joined: 01 Dec 2014 Posts: 178 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
|
|
|
|
onemanband
Joined: 26 Dec 2010 Posts: 1473 Location: NCA90
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|