|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Cathryn
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 19856 Location: Ceredigion
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 8407 Location: South Cornwall
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15982
|
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 8407 Location: South Cornwall
|
Posted: Sat Jul 04, 15 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
Mistress Rose wrote: |
An interesting article, but wasn't the problem in the Isle of Wight called Isle of Wight disease a specific disease, now called nosema? I don't know about the other collapses, but is the reason for some of them now known?
Tavascarow, it is good that more beekeepers are coming in, and yes, more distribution of colonies is good. It concerns me slightly that a number of the new keepers are rejecting all the old ideas and completely blaming the bee decline on the constant inspection and manipulation of bees. While I would admit that the usual way of keeping bees in the UK is probably not perfect, rejecting all the ways can lead to swarming and disease without the beekeeper being aware of it. |
I don't blame the decline on constant interventions by beekeepers, but I would definitely say it's contributing to the problem.
The more an animal is stressed the more susceptible it is to ilness & disease & so much can be found out by careful observation at the hive entrance, there really isn't a need to be constantly opening hives .
Many conventional beekeeping practices are not helpful.
Stopping them fulfilling instincts like swarming & comb building again adds to stress. Allowing them to swarm induces a brood break in both the parent colony & the swarm, this also breaks the varroa breeding cycle & helps 'naturally' to reduce that pests numbers.
Removal & renewal of comb as practiced in most 'natural' beekeeping methods reduces brood disease risk.
A practice now recognised & reccomended by conventional authorities , but only recently.
I could go on & on but basically 'modern beekeeping' hasn't changed much since Langstroth invented his hive in Victorian times & IMHO most 'conventional' beekeepers keep their bees in a very Victorian way.
Working over & trying to control nature instead of working with it & that will always lead to problems. |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15982
|
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 8407 Location: South Cornwall
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 15 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
Mistress Rose wrote: |
Perhaps we will always disagree about some aspects of beekeeping Tavascarow, but living in a suburban area, swarms are not a good idea. When I was our association swarm co-ordinator I had any number of people on the phone panicking because there was a swarm in their garden, and worse still, taking up residence in their cavity wall. In the latter case, we had to advise living with it or getting in destroyed, as our beekeepers couldn't take the house apart to get the bees out.
Artificial swarming works quite well and I think is and has been practices among conventional beekeepers for some time. New comb has been encouraged for a few years now, but agree that this is relatively new.
Conventional beekeepers are very variable. We always used to say in our association that if you have 2 beekeepers they will have at least 3 different points of view on any one subject. The best study what the bees are doing and encourage them in the required direction rather than forcing. The bees tend to go their own way anyway, so working with them is always best. |
I used to have the same attitude as yourself being a conventional beekeeper of long standing before I started reading about 'natural' beekeeping.
But if you reread your post you will see all the things you say are for the convenience of the beekeeper & his neighbours not necessarily for the well being of the bees.
Swarming also has another major benefit.
Control of brood disease.
Brood disease was rarely a problem before frame hives became popular.
Why? because brood disease is just that, a brood disease.
Swarming bees carry no brood & if hived in a clean hive & not fed sugar will consume all the honey they carry with them (that might contain brood disease spores) making new comb.
This is now a recognised practise for anyone who suspects EFB in a colony
Seriously the first real epidemics of brood disease occurred soon after frame hives arrived on the scene, because the primary way beekeepers increased their stocks went from swarming to division of brood & sharing of (possibly infected) frames between colonies.
Prior to that skep beekeepers only had swarms to propagate from & couldn't share brood as all comb was fixed.
Weak colonies where generally culled at the end of each season so the disease was kept well & truly in check. |
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 8407 Location: South Cornwall
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15982
|
|
|
|
|
Tavascarow
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 Posts: 8407 Location: South Cornwall
|
|
|
|
|
tai haku
Joined: 17 Apr 2011 Posts: 472
|
|
|
|
|
Lorrainelovesplants
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 6521 Location: Dordogne
|
|
|
|
|
|