|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46211 Location: yes
|
Posted: Sun Mar 17, 24 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
reasonably safe, long-lasting insulation is a fossil rich process at the mo(rock wool etc)
it would still be better than not using it, done well it should last longer than the building
there are other options with a lower energy input short term, the current affordable alternative stuff does not last as well, some is far worse than that
joined up thought and deeds are required for both harvest and frugal use of energy
a very sideways example
as a "camping stove" i have used a variety of tech
from safety issues through specific fuel and bulky kit to just set it on fire
for a "stove" the multi fuel "wood" gasification thing is ideal, it does require some sort of fuel available, it took energy to create it
it uses very little fuel and that fuel is no carry/non-specific /green energy harvest
compare that to the primus i used in the 1970s. for starters, a rather interesting night trek would not have resulted in paraffin in most of the food and little fuel
a handful of charcoal would have been plenty to cook supper and dry the first of the plentiful sheep dung for the week
i will not mention blazes and bangs
i think my point is that modern kit and old principles can be a game changer
global "green" leccy infrastructure is not that dissimilar to making a safe, portable, fuel adaptable, gasification stove in thought
that a camping stove does not threaten fossil very much might be the big difference |
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15967
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 24 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
We went in to see our next door neighbours set up yesterday. They have solar panels, a battery, heat pump and underfloor heating with a lot of insulation. They seem to have got through the winter all right on just the heat pump, but they do have trouble keeping it cool in summer so have had to put in blinds to keep the sun out of the back where they get full sun in large windows later in the day.
Our house is pretty well insulated downstairs because of its construction; it takes a long time to heat up, and a long time to cool down. The main part of the house gets warm in summer, but not uncomfortably so, and is quite comfortable in winter. We need to concentrate on insulation for the rooms in the roof, which would help a lot.
We have been thinking of solar panels for some time, but it seems now that the shadow of the pylon line dips the input a bit, but isn't too bad, so new ones could be of great use to us now. |
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46211 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
Mistress Rose
Joined: 21 Jul 2011 Posts: 15967
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28234 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28234 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46211 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
Ty Gwyn
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 4613 Location: Lampeter
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
dpack
Joined: 02 Jul 2005 Posts: 46211 Location: yes
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45669 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28234 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
|