|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
joker
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 188 Location: hiding
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
joker
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 188 Location: hiding
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
joker
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 188 Location: hiding
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Thu Mar 03, 05 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
judyofthewoods wrote: |
Yes, this system is feasable on a domestic scale but still very expensive and requires a lot of digging and pipe. Strictly speaking its not what is called geothermal, which involves very deep drilling. |
True geothermal is indeed heat from the earth's core - its viable in Iceland and other volcanic regions but not really here.
Unfortunately the 'geothermal' tag has been borrowed by those selling systems using the ground both as a solar (heat) collector, and year-round, day and night heat store.
A cold fluid is circulated through the buried pipe and returns warmer. This is circulated through a "heat pump" (that works rather like a fridge) that strips the heat from the fluid and 'upgrades' it to a higher temperature.
For every (paid) kilowatt of electricity the heat pump uses, between 4 and 6 kilowatts of useful heat are captured... so these systems can be cheapish to run, although expensive to install.
Unfortunately, the heat pump efficiency drops off as the temperature uplift increases. This means the system is best suited for underfloor heating. And you are likely to need a few hundred metres of pipe buried about a metre down - this can be done with heavy equipment, but your garden/paddock is going to take a pounding!
For these reasons, its only really suited for a new build, where excellent insulation can be installed (minimising the system size), and the groundwork and underfloor installation wouldn't be a problem. Economically, in such a situation, it can be better than oil over perhaps 15 years. Carbon-wise, its better.
Putting the collector circuit in a stream or lake makes an even better prospect. It works pretty well where there's a lot of groundwater.
Some varients involve drilling vertically down, rather than shallow burial of pipe - but still the true origin of the heat is solar rather than geothermal. |
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
judyofthewoods
Joined: 29 Jan 2005 Posts: 804 Location: Pembrokeshire
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
|