|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 07 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
You said British farmers will never compete... That is a line I have heard a lot. I know the implication was perhaps that 'we will never compete on a price basis as long as the economic & legislative imbalance occurs', but I think it worth adding to that; I don't think that British farmers should be looking to compete at all. There will always be rubbish coming in, but if we chose to compete with such people by producing something even more rubbish, then we deserve to go out of business.
crofter wrote: |
I read your superfarms thread, Rob and I agree with what you write. I am not saying "it can't be done" just that global economics will force farming in this country to change, some will adapt quickly enough to survive, others will not. |
There is also a point to be made that global forces would have encouraged change much earlier, rather than forcing it later on, had the UK industry not been set against it with quotas, subsidies and other barriers to change that have held us back all these years. |
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45685 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45685 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
wellington womble
Joined: 08 Nov 2004 Posts: 15051 Location: East Midlands
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 45685 Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
VSS
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 2845 Location: Llyn Peninsula, North Wales
|
|
|
|
|
crofter
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 2252
|
|
|
|
|
Green Man
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 5272 Location: Rural Scotland.
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
|
|
|
|
Rob R
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 31902 Location: York
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 07 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
Cho-ku-ri wrote: |
Farmers, thanks to the subsidies the French and Germans fought for, are so much more resilient than textile or manufacturing businessmen that have long since relocated.
Are we really all prepared to watch it revert to non-productive scrub? |
This is a common misconception that subsidies have helped British farmers. Yes, short term, they improved the viability of some farming enterprises but they, along with the regulations & stipulations that go with them, have held the industry back, resistant to change. Some sectors didn't have the subs,such as pigs & poultry, which meant that to compete with the subsidised sectors they had to go more intensive to be viable. If we hadn't had the subs, I can't see there would have been as much intensive farming as has developed. |
|
|
|
|
Lorrainelovesplants
Joined: 13 Oct 2006 Posts: 6521 Location: Dordogne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|