|
|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 10744
|
|
|
|
|
jema Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 28238 Location: escaped from Swindon
|
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 05 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
jema wrote: |
... last I heard of this technology the major block if I recall rightly was the taxation situation. Since fuel costs are mostly duty, it is good old Gordon who decides on the viability of these schemes. It would be good if the web site covered this fundermental issue. |
IIRC, until a couple of years ago the duty was the same as mineral fuel, (but see below). Two budgets ago Bio duty was reduced, and further reduced last time round.
There are other aspects to the economic viability question - notably the price of Crude Oil and the cost/availability of Bio oil.
Obviously the higer crude prices go, the more attractive a *business* proposition Bio becomes. But more importantly, the *outlook* for crude prices will influence investment decisions on tooling up for commercial production.
Our mainland european neighbours, not having the benefit of North Sea supplies, have been incorporating Bio into their regular diesel blends for some time.
A *requirement* to do this would do wonders to kickstart the infrastructure investment.
The availability of 'free' used oil is what makes homebrew so attractive. And attractive to folks like Sharwoods who now use their 'used' Poppadum oil to fuel their delivery trucks...
Fuel duty. Its actually levied on a *volumetric* basis - so much a litre.
This is actually (approx) 5% unfair to Bio, which is less dense than mineral diesel - so although you would get the same miles per KILO, you actually get about 5% less miles per LITRE with Bio. -- I understand this is directly attributable to their being more Oxygen in each molecule, which also happens to be why it burns 'cleaner' than mineral diesel, with less 'particulates'. These microscopically tiny pieces of soot adsorb (yes!) other nasties onto their surface - and being so small, they blow around for a very long time, and when inhaled they can go very deep into the tubules of the lungs. This is a massive "plus" for Bio that doesn't get 'plugged' enough... |
|
|
|
|
Treacodactyl Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 25795 Location: Jumping on the bandwagon of opportunism
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|