I didn't for a minute envisage this sort of criticism of the mans efforts.
The idea is a good one.I am not saying it isnt.There must be a better way though of projecting the idea with out making the place look like a junk yard.
I'm fairly sure that I understand where you are coming from, however
Dont read to much in to this as you are wrong.this is a completly different forum It has nothing to do with anythink else.
I'm quite happy that most people who have read this article have taken a favourable view of my friends efforts.
And so they should its not a bad idea.I think wind power is a good idea also but i wouldnt have a massive turrbine in my back garden would i.
How it is put up looks unsightly and dangerous i am not the only one to voice these concerns.
It's been up and running for four years without a hitch and with hugely reduced water charges.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
It's been up and running for four years without a hitch and with hugely reduced water charges.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
It's been up and running for four years without a hitch and with hugely reduced water charges.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
i should imagen it would reduce house prices aswell.
Nick
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 34535 Location: Hereford
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 07 9:37 pm Post subject:
CARROTMUNCHER wrote:
Rob R wrote:
CARROTMUNCHER wrote:
what happens if the is a hard frost and the water freezes.It would come through the roof.
Like Grand Designs he could feed all his grey water to an underground tank.
True, though I think the idea of having it on the roof is so that you don't have to rely on pumps to give you the pressure, so it'll be cheaper to run. We're looking at a similar thing for the livestock buildings.
View Latest Posts