|
|
|
|
 |
Author |
|
| Message | |
|
Legion
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 170
Location: Western isles, Scotland
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 25, 04 8:18 pm Post subject: Gender bending chemicals and ISA. |
 
|
In 2002, the powers that be decided that to improve the quality of land (machair) within certain areas of the uists they would agree to it being sprayed with sewerage sludge. I did raise concerns at the time publicly as to the content and repercussions from this decision especially on such fragile land.
It has now been discovered that the sludge contained gender bending chemicals with the result that male lambs have been 'feminised' by chemicals and substances contianed within the sludge , known as endocrine disruptors.
Although the result from the survey says that 'It is 'UNLIKELY'  that the observed behavioural pattern would have significant adverse consequences with respect to animal production and do not pose any direct danger to the consumer'.(The public use this area as a campsite during the summer)
50 tons of sludge ( the recommended ratio) per HA was used, this area has now been fenced off until 2005.
Yet!! according to current European legislation Scottish Water is NOT required to test for endocrine disruptors in sludge which is applied to land.
Now that brings me on to the next subject .
It has been disclosed that in south uist a fish farm has been quarantined as it is under suspicion of harbouring ISA ( Infectious Salmon Anaemia).
Extensive tests will be carried out over the next six months, during which time the company will have to follow stringent movement restrictions.
Meanwhile a north uist crofter - is applying untreated salmon fish waste at the ratio of 50 tons per ha to his land as fertilizer, with approval from the Scottish Executive. Fish waste, from salmon farms has been arriving on articulated lorries at the rate of over 20 tons per day for the last 6 weeks , coming in from all the fish farms on the southern isles (north uist , south uist & Benbecula), some waste even coming in on the ferry from other Islands(Lewis and Harris).
SEPA, insist they are within the law and there is nothing they can do as the fields are not near a water course and are 100 mtrs from the sea.
Worrying aint it.....  such is the madness of the islands. |
|
|
|
 |
Jonnyboy
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 23956
Location: under some rain.
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45669
Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
Legion
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 170
Location: Western isles, Scotland
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45669
Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 26, 04 1:33 pm Post subject: Re: Gender bending chemicals and ISA. |
|
| Legion wrote: |
In 2002, the powers that be decided that to improve the quality of land (machair) within certain areas of the uists they would agree to it being sprayed with sewerage sludge. I did raise concerns at the time publicly as to the content and repercussions from this decision especially on such fragile land.
It has now been discovered that the sludge contained gender bending chemicals with the result that male lambs have been 'feminised' by chemicals and substances contianed within the sludge , known as endocrine disruptors. |
Do you have a reference for this? Can you point us to a study that shows this to be true for this scheme?
| Quote: |
Although the result from the survey says that 'It is 'UNLIKELY' that the observed behavioural pattern would have significant adverse consequences with respect to animal production and do not pose any direct danger to the consumer'.(The public use this area as a campsite during the summer) |
And you have reason to doubt that there would be no adverse effect? Share it with us.
| Quote: |
50 tons of sludge ( the recommended ratio) per HA was used, this area has now been fenced off until 2005.
Yet!! according to current European legislation Scottish Water is NOT required to test for endocrine disruptors in sludge which is applied to land.
|
What do you propose should be done with end-process sewage sludge?
Increasingly, people simply expect this stuff to vanish; we can't put in in the sea, supermarkets won't buy food from land where it's spread, and we won't pay the bills for incineration (nor will anyone volounteer their own back-yard as a site for said incineration).
What do you propose should be done with it?
| Quote: |
Now that brings me on to the next subject .
It has been disclosed that in south uist a fish farm has been quarantined as it is under suspicion of harbouring ISA ( Infectious Salmon Anaemia).
Extensive tests will be carried out over the next six months, during which time the company will have to follow stringent movement restrictions.
Meanwhile a north uist crofter - is applying untreated salmon fish waste at the ratio of 50 tons per ha to his land as fertilizer, with approval from the Scottish Executive. Fish waste, from salmon farms has been arriving on articulated lorries at the rate of over 20 tons per day for the last 6 weeks , coming in from all the fish farms on the southern isles (north uist , south uist & Benbecula), some waste even coming in on the ferry from other Islands(Lewis and Harris).
SEPA, insist they are within the law and there is nothing they can do as the fields are not near a water course and are 100 mtrs from the sea.
Worrying aint it..... such is the madness of the islands. |
And you'd have -what- done with the fish waste?
We all eat, drink and go to the can. All of this produces waste; whether it's farm waste, our own waste, or whatever. And that waste has to go somewhere. Unless you're suggesting that people stop farming and going to the bog, then you have to accept that the waste goes -somewhere-.
Where do you propose that it should go, other than not in your back yard?
Last edited by cab on Fri Nov 26, 04 1:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
cab
Joined: 01 Nov 2004
Posts: 32429
|
|
|
|
|
leebu
Joined: 23 Nov 2004
Posts: 418
Location: east yorkshire
|
|
|
|
|
Legion
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 170
Location: Western isles, Scotland
|
|
|
|
|
deerstalker
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 589
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45669
Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
sean
Downsizer Moderator
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 42219
Location: North Devon
|
|
|
|
|
Legion
Joined: 24 Nov 2004
Posts: 170
Location: Western isles, Scotland
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 01, 04 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
No it isnt sean, the start of my post cleary says what is happening to the site where they sprayed the 'sludge' a couple of years ago. I was horrified they even allowed it, but not suprised with the results. We did tests on this kind of thing over 15 years ago in yorkshire - though they were never confirmed, I had living ( well sort of ) proof at the time, but it was just dismissed, and nothing in my books is a co-incidence, anyhow you read the result.
The fish are a different matter, look at the suspected putbreak on south uist? where has all their waste been going?was the same lorry used to pick up waste from other fish farms - were uncleaned tubs left - has the waste passed though any water couses where they could drip?..more importantly is anyone looking into it? and where has this disease come from , and how?...so yes, I arent well pleased that it drives right past my door, up to 24 tons at a time on a huge articulated lorry, and is then spred on fields that I used to walk my dogs near..........but we'll see, we'll see!! |
|
|
|
|
Behemoth
Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 19023
Location: Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
tahir
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 45669
Location: Essex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archive
Powered by php-BB © 2001, 2005 php-BB Group
Style by marsjupiter.com, released under GNU (GNU/GPL) license.
|
View Latest Posts