Aerial Photography and stuff.

Latest Articles

Aerial Photography and stuff.
Page Previous 1, 2

Downsizer Forum Index -> Small Business Questions, Ideas and Advice

Author

Message

Slim

Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 6612
Location: New England (In the US of A)

Posted: Sat Apr 15, 17 10:35 pm Post subject:
over 10% of the overall budget seems a bit steep to me

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Sat Apr 15, 17 11:49 pm Post subject:

onemanband wrote:

Looking at HL's link it all looks and sounds very professional...

Do you think?
My reading of it was that the plan is to raise a load of cash to pay a professional planner to help them get a grant to fix up the building and then everything will be dandy.
All seems to me to be built on blind faith and optimism.

Clearly professional planning is needed, but to my mind the way forward with any project is to take it as far as you can yourself, and have the professional address the necessary details.

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Sat Apr 15, 17 11:57 pm Post subject:

NorthernMonkeyGirl wrote:

Is aerial photography to cover monitoring over the course of the project?

My understanding is that they're basically raising money to be able put in a proper bid for lottery funding.
If it is for regular monitoring, then I would definitely say to buy a drone.

Quote:

I hope it works, if I had a spare �100 I'd chuck it in the pot.

You can join the trust for �10: https://www.kvdt.org.uk/about/ and I also hope it works, they're just not giving me confidence that it will.

That said, they have now raised the �40k they were after: https://twitter.com/@KirkstallValley

onemanband

Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Posts: 1473
Location: NCA90

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 17 8:32 am Post subject:

Hairyloon wrote:

onemanband wrote:

Looking at HL's link it all looks and sounds very professional...

Ah, the Brexit model

Another quick search shows a �100 drone is a toy. �500-�1000 might get you something half decent. �5000-�10000 for professional kit.
It's one thing, say, buying some basic gardening kit for volunteers to clear some ground, it's another to spend a few hundred on a drone which may crash and burn, or break down and be unrepairable.
If you want amateur pics then you could just ask around, find someone with a toy drone.
I guess professional pics are required to sell the project to the big investors.

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 17 7:25 pm Post subject:

onemanband wrote:

Hairyloon wrote:

All seems to me to be built on blind faith and optimism.

Ah, the Brexit model

Sounds about right. I'm hoping that someone will come along and point out what I've missed, but no joy on that so far...

Quote:

Another quick search shows a �100 drone is a toy. �500-�1000 might get you something half decent. �5000-�10000 for professional kit.

Could I trouble you for links to what you've found?

Quote:

It's one thing, say, buying some basic gardening kit for volunteers to clear some ground, it's another to spend a few hundred on a drone which may crash and burn...

I'm slightly confused by your comparison there; did you change tack halfway through the point? I'm prone to that, but since you've brought it up, that is the other thing that bothers me about this proposal: very limited scope for volunteers to engage. If they get the funding it will have to go to a big firm to do the work.
I'd start off with ground works which anybody can get involved with, and from that you can pick out and train teams to tackle (or at least help with) the more difficult work.

Quote:

If you want amateur pics then you could just ask around, find someone with a toy drone.
I guess professional pics are required to sell the project to the big investors.

It is not yet clear for why the aerial photography is wanted. Perhaps I am too cynical, but the flashier the presentation, the more I look at what they are hiding...
And if I was an investor, I'd be looking at cost effective use of resources: over 10% of the budget on presentation before there is anything to present doesn't seem good to me...

Slim

Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 6612
Location: New England (In the US of A)

Posted: Sun Apr 16, 17 9:59 pm Post subject:

Hairyloon wrote:

Quote:

If you want amateur pics then you could just ask around, find someone with a toy drone.
I guess professional pics are required to sell the project to the big investors.

The flip side to that is if they are able to attract a very large donation/investment than the aerial photography will end up having been a drop in the plan in the long term. (Edit: just realized I combined pan and plan. Keeping it

)

So it's 10% of this budget, but what's the long term plan and budget?

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 17 7:47 am Post subject:

Slim wrote:

So it's 10% of this budget, but what's the long term plan and budget?

As discussed earlier:

Hairyloon wrote:

get a grant to fix up the building and then everything will be dandy.

More specifically, grand (but vague) plans about sustainability research, education and community development.

onemanband

Joined: 26 Dec 2010
Posts: 1473
Location: NCA90

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 17 11:48 am Post subject:

HL. IIRC I searched 'which drone' and it was a 2017 Telegraph piece I based my generalisation on. I may have over-egged the professional kit but OTOH when you add in cameras and accessories that's probably a fair figure for the total kit being used.

Re; my change of tack.....
I'm just imagining the meeting where they go through the expenses....

"we spent �300 on shovels, rakes, wheelbarrows and gloves. And �250 on a skip"
"That's fine. What's this �600 for a drone ?"
"to take pictures"
"And this next �600 for a drone ?"
"Oh, the first one crashed and burnt"
"Hold on there's 3 lots of �600"
"Yes the second one developed an electrical problem"
"and you couldn't fix it ?"
"No.....made in China, can't get parts"
"let's see the pictures then...."
"Er well they're a bit blurry - we need a bit more practice"
"FFS why didn't you get someone in ?"

Nick

Joined: 02 Nov 2004
Posts: 34535
Location: Hereford

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 17 4:29 pm Post subject:
"We did. There was this bloke in Leeds who figured he could do anything for a tenner..."

Midlandsman

Joined: 22 May 2014
Posts: 116

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 17 9:17 pm Post subject:
I'm reading it as 'website & aerial photography' rather than just the aerial photography for a website. Is that correct? MM

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Mon Apr 17, 17 9:45 pm Post subject:

Midlandsman wrote:

I'm reading it as 'website & aerial photography' rather than just the aerial photography for a website. Is that correct?

As far as we know...
It has been said to them that the numbers have the feel of having been plucked out of the air and they made no attempt to correct the suggestion.

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 17 9:02 am Post subject:
And look what happened to pop up on my Facebook feed: https://www.coptrz.com/drone-training/caa-permission-for-commercial-operation-course.html?utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=Training&utm_medium=Advert

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 17 4:01 pm Post subject:
I posted an update some time back, but just realised I'd posted on the wrong thread. They were knocked back on the Lottery funding and have had to go back to the drawing board. They're now doing a survey... not a bad place to start.

dpack

Joined: 02 Jul 2005
Posts: 46245
Location: yes

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 17 5:11 pm Post subject:

it is a survey but it is a very amateur sort of survey which may gain some basic sharp focus data and some varied soft focus data. it provides little in the way of information regarding aims and objectives identified so far or about what may be required to achieve them.

it looks like a student project rather than a professional or locals led community development scheme.

wooly is an understatement and if the lottery grant application was of a similar standard i can see why it was knocked back.

Hairyloon

Joined: 20 Nov 2008
Posts: 15425
Location: Today I are mostly being in Yorkshire.

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 17 5:47 pm Post subject:

dpack wrote:

it provides little in the way of information regarding aims and objectives identified so far or about what may be required to achieve them.

There may be a reason for that... Or maybe I'm just a cynical git?

Quote:

it looks like a student project rather than a professional or locals led community development scheme.

wooly is an understatement and if the lottery grant application was of a similar standard i can see why it was knocked back.

I think the knock back is a good thing: leaping off without a plan is rarely a good idea...

	Downsizer Forum Index -> Small Business Questions, Ideas and Advice	All times are GMT Page Previous 1, 2
Page 2 of 2

View Latest Posts