|
|
Author |
|
Message | |
|
Blue Peter
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 2400 Location: Milton Keynes
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs
Joined: 28 Oct 2004 Posts: 10744
|
|
|
|
|
ken69
Joined: 17 Jul 2005 Posts: 316 Location: Norfolk
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Peter
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Posts: 2400 Location: Milton Keynes
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
|
|
|
|
hils
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 568 Location: Nottingham
|
|
|
|
|
karl
Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 9 Location: Nottingham UK
|
|
|
|
|
dougal
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 7184 Location: South Kent
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 05 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
Hi karl, and welcome to the site.
I'd guess those are exactly the maps Peter was looking for. Thanks!
The notes suggest a rise of less than 50cm in the next 75 years, unless one of the big ice sheets melts catastrophically quickly.
And the most risky one is given a 1 in 20 chance of melting within 200 years - giving a 7m rise.
And even with that, the major *areas* affected are the Fens, Romney Marsh and the Trent valley. Yes, there are places all round the 'coast' that would be affected, Selsey Bill, Bridgewater, Thanet becoming an "isle" again...
I suspect that London would be unquestionably protected against such a rise, but I'm less sure about Romney Marsh (Dungeness nuclear power stations?) or the Fens.
Another aspect is river drainage. Direct estuary effects aside, I suspect that a whole new bunch of places would be susceptible to "the Lewis effect" where a river in spate meets a high tide...
And then there's the questions of erosion of thee new coast and those areas newly susceptible to occasional tidal and storm flooding... |
|
|
|
|
thos
Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Posts: 1139 Location: Jauche, Duchy of Brabant (Bourgogne-ci) and Charolles, Duchy of Burgundy (Bourgogne-�a)
|
|
|
|
|
|